Freehit is a term used in the game of cricket, which suggests a standard that allows a batsman to take a free swing at the ball without any bet of getting out. This standard is important in unambiguous limited overs associations of the game, similar to One Day Internationals (ODIs) and Twenty20 (T20) matches.

The freehit rule turns out to be perhaps the main variable when a bowler bowls a no-ball, and that suggests that the ball is viewed as unlawful because of some particular misstep in the transport. A part of the typical clarifications behind a no-ball consolidate the bowler disregarding the kink, throwing the ball rather than bowling it, or having more than one bouncer in an over. In such a circumstance, the umpire hails a no-ball, and the batsman gets a freehit. When a batsman gets a freehit, it suggests that he can cause a commotion in and out of town without worrying over getting in the standard ways, for instance, got, bowled, or lbw (leg before wicket). The primary way he can get out is through a run-out or baffled, and that infers he needs to guarantee he doesn't leave his flaw while trying a superstar.

The freehit rule has conveyed a completely exhilarating viewpoint to confined overs cricket, as it allows the batsmen to play with greater open door and face more difficulties. It in like manner descends on the bowler, who should be extra careful so as not to bowl a no-ball. A freehit is commonly viewed as a unique opportunity for the batsman to score runs and put the strain in a difficult spot in the dealing with bunch.

There have been various critical junction in cricket history when a batsman has profited by a freehit. One such model is from the 2011 World Cup quarter-last among India and Australia. In the 24th over of India's innings, pacer Brett Lee bowled a no-ball to Indian opener Virender Sehwag, who then, at that point, hit the accompanying ball for a six. This was followed by a breaking point on the accompanying ball, and India's innings got the energy it expected to post a significant total.While the freehit eu rule has been by and large invited by fans and players the equivalent, there have been a couple of responses as well. A couple of intellectuals fight that the standard endowments the batsmen to a limit and descends on the bowlers. Others have raised stresses that the standard is provoking every one of the more no-balls being bowled purposefully, as the bowlers endeavor to make an effort not to get hit for sixes or fours.

No matter what these responses, the freehit rule remains a vital piece of limited overs cricket, and it is putting down profound roots. It has added one more layer of intensity and eccentricism to the game, and it has permitted the batsmen an amazing chance to show their capacities and connect with the fans. The freehit rule is one of the various improvements that cricket has seen all through the long haul, and it is a showing of the game's ability to create and conform to developing times.